Description: |
Drago Campa (WSBA No. 23947, admitted 1994), Los Angeles, California, was disbarred, effective March 16, 2012, by order of the Washington State Supreme Court imposing reciprocal discipline in accordance with an order by the Supreme Court of the State of California following a default hearing. This discipline resulted from conduct in two matters involving the unauthorized practice of law, failure to protect a client’s interests, failure to communicate, failure to account for client funds, acts of moral turpitude, conversion of funds, misrepresentation to a tribunal, filing a false declaration, and failure to cooperate in a Bar Association investigation. For more information, see the State Bar of California’s Bar Journal (January 2012), available at www.calbarjournal.com/january2012/ attorneydiscipline/disbarments.aspx#8.
Mr. Campa’s conduct violated California’s RPC 1-300(B), prohibiting a lawyer from practicing law in a jurisdiction where to do so would be in violation of regulations of the profession in that jurisdiction; California’s RPC 3-700(D)(1), requiring a lawyer whose employment was terminated to promptly release to the client, at the request of the client, all the client papers and property; California’s RPC 4-100(B)(3), requiring a lawyer to maintain complete records of all funds, securities, and other properties of a client coming into the possession of the lawyer or law firm and render appropriate accounts to the client regarding them; California’s RPC 4-100(B)(4), requiring a lawyer to promptly pay or deliver, as requested by the client, any funds, securities, or other properties in the possession of the lawyer which the client is entitled to receive; California’s Business and Professions Code § 6068(d), providing that it is the duty of a lawyer to never seek to mislead a judge by an artifice or false statement of fact or law; California’s Business and Professions Code § 6068 (m), requiring a lawyer to respond promptly to reasonable status inquiries of clients and to keep clients reasonably informed of significant developments in matters with regard to which the lawyer has agreed to provide legal services; California’s Business and Professions Code § 6068(i), requiring a lawyer to cooperate and participate in any disciplinary investigation or proceeding pending against the lawyer; and California’s Business and Professions Code § 6106, prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption.
Joanne S. Abelson represented the Bar Association. Mr. Campa represented himself. |