Discipline Notice - Andrew M. Brackbill

License Number: 17090
Member Name: Andrew M. Brackbill
Discipline Detail
Action: Suspension
Effective Date: 5/19/2010
RPC: 1.3 - Diligence
1.4 - Communication
3.2 - Expediting Litigation
8.4 (c) - Dishonesty, Fraud, Deceit or Misrepresentation
Discipline Notice:
Description: Andrew M. Brackbill (WSBA No. 17090, admitted 1987), of Seattle, was suspended for six months, effective May 19, 2010, by order of the Washington State Supreme Court following approval of a stipulation. This discipline is based on conduct involving a failure to act diligently, communicate, and expedite litigation.

Clients A and B, owners of a restaurant, retained Mr. Brackbill to pursue a malpractice claim against an architect hired to do the remodel of a space they planned to lease. The clients paid Mr. Brackbill $750 in legal fees. The clients alleged the architect told them no sprinkler system was needed, which was not true. As a result, the clients paid tens of thousands of dollars to install the sprinkler system.

After some delay, on March 7, 2006, Mr. Brackbill filed a complaint against the architect in superior court. In July 2006, after the defendant filed an answer and counterclaim, Mr. Brackbill forwarded the pleadings to his clients. Mr. Brackbill failed to respond to the architect’s discovery requests to his clients, and in June 2007, the court compelled Mr. Brackbill’s clients to respond to the discovery requests. Again, Mr. Brackbill failed to respond, and in August 2007, the court dismissed the complaint. By subsequent agreement, Mr. Brackbill and the architect’s counsel agreed to dismiss the architect’s counterclaims for unpaid fees.

Client A repeatedly tried to obtain status reports from Mr. Brackbill, with only sporadic success, between 2006 and 2009. Client A had no idea about the discovery requests or that the case had been dismissed until after he filed a grievance with the Bar Association.

Mr. Brackbill’s conduct violated RPC 1.3, requiring a lawyer to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; RPC 1.4, requiring a lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed of the matter and comply with requests for information; RPC 3.2, requiring a lawyer to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client; and RPC 8.4(c), prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Linda B. Eide represented the Bar Association. Mr. Brackbill represented himself.


In some cases, discipline search results will not reveal all disciplinary action relating to a Washington licensed legal professional, and may not display links to the official decision documents. Click the "Important Information" button below for further details.

Important Information +


This discipline search accesses notices of disciplinary action since 1984, and for cases decided in 2013 or later, also generally includes the official decision documents. The search does not contain pre-1984 notices or records, and may not contain the official decision documents in cases decided before 2013. To obtain other records of discipline, including pre-1984 discipline documents, please make a public records request.

The action listed on the discipline notice does not in all cases reflect the current status of the legal professional's license. Check the Legal Directory for current status information.